← back to timeline

EXP-PERSONA-ABLATION

pending

PERSONA ablation — emergent or prescribed differentiation?

2026-04-17 L5 level paper3 5 runs $0.08
new
premortem
mock
real
metrics
analyze
review
krit
done

In plain language

Researchers are investigating whether an AI's distinct behaviors are naturally learned or simply follow instructions. They tested this by having the AI act with one set of instructions for a period, then switching to simpler instructions. The results will show if the AI's unique behaviors persist after the initial instructions are removed, indicating if these behaviors emerged on their own.

Technical details

Research hypothesis

Absorption diagnostic showed PERSONA_C has d_between=0.78 (close to ISOLATED 0.87). But differentiation may be PRESCRIBED (agents follow persona text) rather than EMERGENT (structure beyond prompt). Test: run PERSONA for rounds 0-40, then swap to MINIMAL for 40-80. Compare second-half differentiation: - matches PERSONA_C (absorption-diag rounds 40-80) → EMERGENT - decays to MINIMAL_C → PRESCRIBED

Experimental setup

Type: simple

Condition Parameters
PERSONA_ABLATE_40 persona: PERSONA, coupling: COUPLED, n_runs: 5

Factors: coupling (COUPLED)

Parameters

n_agents
6
n_rounds
80
n_runs_per_condition
5
model
google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite
temperature
0.7
scheduler
round_robin
persona-ablation emergence-test diagnostic ladder-1a-prime-2