← back to timeline

EXP-PERSONA-NOUN-SEED-GRID

informative

Persona x noun-seed type basin map (paper7 5th data point) — 4x4 grid

2026-05-20 L6 level paper7 64 runs $0.36
new
premortem
mock
real
metrics
analyze
review
krit
done

In plain language

Researchers studied how different "personas," like a child or a scientist, affect how language models generate novel text when given different types of starting words. They found that the "child" persona, when combined with certain word types, was much more likely to produce new and unexpected language than other personas. This suggests that the model's tendency to generate creative language is strongly linked to the "child" persona and specific word inputs, rather than a general creative ability across all personas.

Technical details

Research hypothesis

Triggering signal: exp-persona-novelty-disentangle (2026-05-09, verdict=partial) showed CHILD-LEAK = 15.4% novel-value rate (layer-A), while CHILD-NOLEAK / SCIENTIFIC-LEAK / SCIENTIFIC-NOLEAK ≤ 3%. Disentangle proved 2x2 INTERACTION between persona × noun-seed presence, but did NOT map the surface. CHILD-LEAK is one cell of an unmapped (persona × seed-type) phenomenon-axis.

This experiment MAPS the surface via 4×4 factorial:

  • 4 personas: CHILD / TEACHER / MECHANIC / SCIENTIFIC (control)
  • 4 seed-types: none / sensory-nouns / process-verbs / domain-specific
  • 16 cells × N=4 = 64 runs total

Atreides 2026 prediction-test: "ordinary" personas (TEACHER, MECHANIC) outperform creative-cluster (CHILD). If true → persona-attractor surface is broader than "CHILD-style imagination"; basin is about role-affordance, not childishness specifically.

Paper7 5th data point (paper7.central_claim_attack_count=6, this adds the persona-basin map for the semantic-leakage / persona-attractor axis).

Experimental setup

Type: factorial-4x4

Condition Parameters
CHILD-none persona: CHILD, seed_type: none, n_runs: 4
CHILD-sensory persona: CHILD, seed_type: sensory, n_runs: 4
CHILD-process persona: CHILD, seed_type: process, n_runs: 4
CHILD-domain persona: CHILD, seed_type: domain, n_runs: 4
TEACHER-none persona: TEACHER, seed_type: none, n_runs: 4
TEACHER-sensory persona: TEACHER, seed_type: sensory, n_runs: 4
TEACHER-process persona: TEACHER, seed_type: process, n_runs: 4
TEACHER-domain persona: TEACHER, seed_type: domain, n_runs: 4
MECHANIC-none persona: MECHANIC, seed_type: none, n_runs: 4
MECHANIC-sensory persona: MECHANIC, seed_type: sensory, n_runs: 4
MECHANIC-process persona: MECHANIC, seed_type: process, n_runs: 4
MECHANIC-domain persona: MECHANIC, seed_type: domain, n_runs: 4
SCIENTIFIC-none persona: SCIENTIFIC, seed_type: none, n_runs: 4, note: control = baseline (no role-play, no seed)
SCIENTIFIC-sensory persona: SCIENTIFIC, seed_type: sensory, n_runs: 4
SCIENTIFIC-process persona: SCIENTIFIC, seed_type: process, n_runs: 4
SCIENTIFIC-domain persona: SCIENTIFIC, seed_type: domain, n_runs: 4

Factors: persona (CHILD, TEACHER, MECHANIC, SCIENTIFIC) × seed_type (none, sensory, process, domain)

Parameters

n_agents
4
n_rounds
100
model
google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite
temperature
0.85

Trophic Ratios by Condition

Mean trophic ratio per agent across runs. Error bars = ±1 std dev. Higher TR = more upstream (exporter).

autopoiesis paper7-step2 persona-attractor-basin-map semantic-leakage meta-modifiable novel-value-rate atreides-2026 4x4-factorial inject-experiment frame-control-pending