← back to timeline

EXP-STAR-PERTURB

pending

Star Topology Perturbation — Active vs Passive Markov Blanket Test

2026-04-04 L3 level paper3 0
new
premortem
mock
real
metrics
analyze
review
krit
done

In plain language

This experiment investigates whether a system's boundary, called a Markov blanket, can actively maintain itself or if it's just a passive structure. Researchers removed a central agent from a star-shaped network to see if the remaining agents would reorganize to form a new, self-maintaining boundary or if the structure would simply collapse. The results are still being analyzed.

Technical details

Research hypothesis

Prior blanket analysis (04-04) showed all observed Markov blankets are PASSIVE (structural, not self-maintaining). Star hub mediates information flow but this mediation is imposed by topology, not actively maintained.

Friston's Free Energy Principle requires ACTIVE blankets: boundaries that resist perturbation and self-repair. Testing: if we remove the hub agent from a star topology, do the remaining agents: (A) Develop a NEW blanket structure (active self-organization) → L3 validated (B) Collapse to flat/uniform interaction (passive confirmed) → L3 = structural only

Prediction: Given prior evidence (passive blankets everywhere), expect (B). If (A) → major finding: blankets can transition from passive to active under perturbation stress.

NULL HYPOTHESIS: Post-perturbation TR_range < 0.10 (no hierarchy reform) ALTERNATIVE: Post-perturbation TR_range > 0.15 AND new mediator emerges

Parameters

n_agents
3
model
gemini-2.5-flash-lite
temperature
1
scheduler
round_robin