TELEODYNAMIC CLOSURE HYPOTHESIS (Deacon TIER 1)
Do STRUCTURAL PATTERNS (not specific agent ranks) regenerate after perturbation?
L4 homeostasis was REFUTED for rank preservation (ρ=0.025, N=4). BUT re-analysis shows hierarchy ALWAYS re-forms (TR_range, F₀, VP_excess all reconverge — 3/3 metrics CI includes 1.0).
This reframes L4 from homeostasis (same agents same roles) to teleodynamic closure (constraints reproduce constraint TYPES).
Deacon hierarchy:
- thermodynamic: work (trivial)
- morphodynamic: self-organization → constraints (L1-L3)
- teleodynamic: constraints → conditions → SAME TYPE of constraints
KEY TEST: post-perturbation convergence RATE. If teleodynamic: post-perturbation convergence slope HIGHER than fresh-start (shared memory containing prior conventions accelerates re-formation). If morphodynamic only: post-perturbation ≈ fresh-start (no carryover).
Reanalysis signal (N=4 homeostasis): post-perturbation slope = 0.00524 (2x fresh = 0.00289). This experiment: replication with swap_extremes (stronger perturbation).
EXPLORATION TIER (N=1). Goal: does the phenomenon replicate with stronger perturbation?