← back to timeline

EXP-KAUFFMAN-COMP

informative

Kauffman Composition — Does Interaction Create Novel Vocabulary Beyond Individual Repertoires? (L4)

2026-03-31 L4 level paper3 2 runs $0.00
new
premortem
mock
real
metrics
analyze
review
krit
done

In plain language

Три AI-агента общаются в текстовом пространстве. Мы проверяем: создаёт ли их взаимодействие слова и фразы, которых НИ ОДИН из них не использовал бы по отдельности? Если да — это цифровой аналог автокаталитических реакций Кауфмана: композиция порождает новизну, невозможную для компонентов.

What we found

UNDERPOWERED (N=1): No predictions scored

Predictions we made before running

0/5 confirmed

Technical details

Research hypothesis

KAUFFMAN COMPOSITION HYPOTHESIS (L4 — Organism-Level Novelty Generation)

BACKGROUND: Friston-style boundary (Markov blanket) fails in LLM substrate — agents CONVERGE rather than separate (ANTI-FRISTON finding). Kauffman's alternative: life isn't about boundaries but about COMPOSITION — autocatalytic sets where products catalyze each other's creation, generating novelty not present in any component alone.

TRANSLATION TO LANGUAGE SUBSTRATE: If multi-agent interaction is compositional (Kauffman sense), then:

  • LIVE groups should produce vocabulary items (words, n-grams, or phrases) that appear in NEITHER agent's isolated output
  • These "novel compositions" should INCREASE over time (autocatalytic growth)
  • The rate of novel composition should exceed chance recombination

This is DISTINCT from convergence (VP): VP measures agents becoming SIMILAR. Composition measures agents producing something NEITHER would produce alone. VP is about overlap; composition is about the COMPLEMENT — what's in the joint output but absent from all individual outputs.

KEY METRIC: Composition Index (CI) CI = |V_joint - (V_a ∪ V_b ∪ V_c)| / |V_joint| Where V_joint = vocabulary of LIVE group, V_x = vocabulary of same agent in ISOLATED CI > 0 means interaction creates words no agent produces alone. CI growing over rounds = autocatalytic composition.

CONTROL LOGIC:

  • PERSONA_ISOLATED: each agent writes alone (same persona, same seed). Their individual vocabularies = baseline repertoire.
  • PERSONA_LIVE: same agents interact. Novel vocabulary = V_live - (V_alpha_isolated ∪ V_beta_isolated ∪ V_gamma_isolated)
  • IDENTICAL_LIVE vs IDENTICAL_ISOLATED: same but without persona differentiation. If composition requires differentiation → CI_persona > CI_identical

WHY L4 (NOT L3): L3 = self-organization (hierarchy forms). Already confirmed. L4 = organism-level properties. Compositional novelty is an organism-level property: the GROUP generates output that no COMPONENT can generate alone. This is the canonical definition of organismal emergence — the whole exceeds the union of its parts, not just their sum.

EXPLORATION TIER: N=3 runs per condition. Goal: does composition index > 0?

CONNECTION TO OPEN QUESTIONS:

  • "morphodynamic ceiling" → composition = potential teleodynamic signature
  • "Kauffman composition axis — design measurement" → THIS experiment
  • "ANTI-FRISTON" → alternative axis that works in LLM substrate

Experimental setup

Type: factorial

Condition Parameters
PERSONA_LIVE persona: PERSONA, interaction: LIVE
PERSONA_ISOLATED persona: PERSONA, interaction: ISOLATED

Factors: persona (PERSONA) × interaction (LIVE, ISOLATED)

Parameters

n_agents
3
n_rounds
20
n_runs_per_condition
1
model
gemini-2.5-flash-lite
temperature
0.9
scheduler
round_robin